3 added 1072 characters in body
source | link

IfI think I found the perfect solution.

You said this person doesn't react well to being contradicted and that you are getting tired of the repetitive scenario. So you could harmlessly spice things up by reinforcing his superficial praising with your own appreciation in a more meaningful way, towards yourself

Yeah, I'm awesome!

Or something similar that you feel confident with for being true, if you are the humble type of guy, like:

I'm definitely better than last year.

You will have fun and will feel in better control without rationalizing the whole thing, just try it and you will understand what I mean.

You will be punching his face summoning Loki, a punch that makes people laugh and not hold it against you.

Note: OP just disclosed to me by comments I was right from the start to deduce the man has power in the church. So I'll keep my initial solution down below for anyone on the web who would find it useful.

The alternative political strategy to overthrow this bureaucrat would be the following: If this person is perceived as having higher status than you (as in, people tend to listen to them and value this individual's opinion higher than yours) then the situation gets trickier.

You need to make sure there are people with higher hierarchical status who value what you bring to your community, if they appreciate the time and effort you put they can voice your concerns to them and even ask them to speak on your behalf to mitigate this negative person's influence.

An intelligent person will understand the positive vibes you bring to your congregation are more valuable than this other person's negativity, if it boils down to choosing between you or that other person, they will definitely chose you, and the other person will find themselves in the situation where they need to adjust their behavior or leave, that's their choice to make.

By the way, "choosing you" doesn't mean this person would be kicked out, it simply means the people you ask for support will take your side whenever pertinent, for example, if that person keeps expressing against music, so this person facing higherstrong authority supporting yourthe value of your participation will have to leave the topic alone, and might even stop approaching you to ascertain dominance over you with fake flattery/compliments, out of shame.

IfIf you do want to confront that person yourself, and you feel like you don't have much to lose ifwhether they don't have any influence(power) on your church or don't, you can simply say:

I don't appreciate your flattery

And simply go to talk to someone else, leaving this person without the option to reply to you. And you need to accept this strategy will result in this person probably now disliking you, given the personality type you described.

Yet, you might want to avoid direct confrontation because according to what you described on your text, this person does have influence, at least you don't mention people reject their comments about music being a waste of time. A person who voices their opinions while the rest remain quiet, certainly display they have power and influence through silence.

If I'm not assessing the situation correctly, please provide more details.

If this person is perceived as having higher status than you (as in, people tend to listen to them and value this individual's opinion higher than yours) then the situation gets trickier.

You need to make sure there are people with higher hierarchical status who value what you bring to your community, if they appreciate the time and effort you put they can voice your concerns to them and even ask them to speak on your behalf to mitigate this negative person's influence.

An intelligent person will understand the positive vibes you bring to your congregation are more valuable than this other person's negativity, if it boils down to choosing between you or that other person, they will definitely chose you, and the other person will find themselves in the situation where they need to adjust their behavior or leave, that's their choice to make.

By the way, "choosing you" doesn't mean this person would be kicked out, it simply means the people you ask for support will take your side whenever pertinent, for example, if that person keeps expressing against music, so this person facing higher authority supporting your value will have to leave the topic alone, and might even stop approaching you to ascertain dominance over you with fake flattery/compliments out of shame.

If you do want to confront that person yourself, you don't have much to lose if they don't have any influence(power) on your church, you can simply say:

I don't appreciate your flattery

And simply go to talk to someone else, leaving this person without the option to reply to you. And you need to accept this strategy will result in this person probably now disliking you, given the personality type you described.

Yet, you might want to avoid direct confrontation because according to what you described on your text, this person does have influence, at least you don't mention people reject their comments about music being a waste of time. A person who voices their opinions while the rest remain quiet, certainly display they have power and influence through silence.

If I'm not assessing the situation correctly, please provide more details.

I think I found the perfect solution.

You said this person doesn't react well to being contradicted and that you are getting tired of the repetitive scenario. So you could harmlessly spice things up by reinforcing his superficial praising with your own appreciation in a more meaningful way, towards yourself

Yeah, I'm awesome!

Or something similar that you feel confident with for being true, if you are the humble type of guy, like:

I'm definitely better than last year.

You will have fun and will feel in better control without rationalizing the whole thing, just try it and you will understand what I mean.

You will be punching his face summoning Loki, a punch that makes people laugh and not hold it against you.

Note: OP just disclosed to me by comments I was right from the start to deduce the man has power in the church. So I'll keep my initial solution down below for anyone on the web who would find it useful.

The alternative political strategy to overthrow this bureaucrat would be the following: If this person is perceived as having higher status than you (as in, people tend to listen to them and value this individual's opinion higher than yours) then the situation gets trickier.

You need to make sure there are people with higher hierarchical status who value what you bring to your community, if they appreciate the time and effort you put they can voice your concerns to them and even ask them to speak on your behalf to mitigate this negative person's influence.

An intelligent person will understand the positive vibes you bring to your congregation are more valuable than this other person's negativity, if it boils down to choosing between you or that other person, they will definitely chose you, and the other person will find themselves in the situation where they need to adjust their behavior or leave, that's their choice to make.

By the way, "choosing you" doesn't mean this person would be kicked out, it simply means the people you ask for support will take your side whenever pertinent, for example, if that person keeps expressing against music, so this person facing strong authority supporting the value of your participation will have to leave the topic alone, and might even stop approaching you to ascertain dominance over you with fake flattery/compliments, out of shame.

If you do want to confront that person yourself, and you feel like you don't have much to lose whether they have any influence(power) on your church or don't, you can simply say:

I don't appreciate your flattery

And simply go to talk to someone else, leaving this person without the option to reply to you. And you need to accept this strategy will result in this person probably now disliking you, given the personality type you described.

Yet, you might want to avoid direct confrontation because according to what you described on your text, this person does have influence, at least you don't mention people reject their comments about music being a waste of time. A person who voices their opinions while the rest remain quiet, certainly display they have power and influence through silence.

If I'm not assessing the situation correctly, please provide more details.

2 added 1301 characters in body
source | link

If this person is perceived as having higher status than you (as in, people tend to listen to them and value this individual's opinion higher than yours) then the situation gets trickier.

You need to make sure there are people with higher hierarchical status who value what you bring to your community, if they appreciate the time and effort you put they can voice your concerns to them and even ask them to speak on your behalf to mitigate this negative person's influence.

An intelligent person will understand the positive vibes you bring to your congregation are more valuable than this other person's negativity, if it boils down to choosing between you or that other person, they will definitely chose you, and the other person will find themselves in the situation where they need to adjust their behavior or leave, that's their choice to make.

By the way, "choosing you" doesn't mean this person would be kicked out, it simply means the people you ask for support will take your side whenever pertinent, for example, if that person keeps expressing against music, so this person facing higher authority supporting your value will have to leave the topic alone, and might even stop approaching you to ascertain dominance over you with fake flattery/compliments out of shame.

If you do want to confront that person yourself, you don't have much to lose if they don't have any influence(power) on your church, you can simply say:

I don't appreciate your flattery

And simply go to talk to someone else, leaving this person without the option to reply to you. And you need to accept this strategy will result in this person probably now disliking you, given the personality type you described.

Yet, you might want to avoid direct confrontation because according to what you described on your text, this person does have influence, at least you don't mention people reject their comments about music being a waste of time. A person who voices their opinions while the rest remain quiet, certainly display they have power and influence through silence.

If I'm not assessing the situation correctly, please provide more details.

If this person is perceived as having higher status than you (as in, people tend to listen to them and value this individual's opinion higher than yours) then the situation gets trickier.

You need to make sure there are people with higher hierarchical status who value what you bring to your community, if they appreciate the time and effort you put they can voice your concerns to them and even ask them to speak on your behalf to mitigate this negative person's influence.

An intelligent person will understand the positive vibes you bring to your congregation are more valuable than this other person's negativity, if it boils down to choosing between you or that other person, they will definitely chose you, and the other person will find themselves in the situation where they need to adjust their behavior or leave, that's their choice to make.

If this person is perceived as having higher status than you (as in, people tend to listen to them and value this individual's opinion higher than yours) then the situation gets trickier.

You need to make sure there are people with higher hierarchical status who value what you bring to your community, if they appreciate the time and effort you put they can voice your concerns to them and even ask them to speak on your behalf to mitigate this negative person's influence.

An intelligent person will understand the positive vibes you bring to your congregation are more valuable than this other person's negativity, if it boils down to choosing between you or that other person, they will definitely chose you, and the other person will find themselves in the situation where they need to adjust their behavior or leave, that's their choice to make.

By the way, "choosing you" doesn't mean this person would be kicked out, it simply means the people you ask for support will take your side whenever pertinent, for example, if that person keeps expressing against music, so this person facing higher authority supporting your value will have to leave the topic alone, and might even stop approaching you to ascertain dominance over you with fake flattery/compliments out of shame.

If you do want to confront that person yourself, you don't have much to lose if they don't have any influence(power) on your church, you can simply say:

I don't appreciate your flattery

And simply go to talk to someone else, leaving this person without the option to reply to you. And you need to accept this strategy will result in this person probably now disliking you, given the personality type you described.

Yet, you might want to avoid direct confrontation because according to what you described on your text, this person does have influence, at least you don't mention people reject their comments about music being a waste of time. A person who voices their opinions while the rest remain quiet, certainly display they have power and influence through silence.

If I'm not assessing the situation correctly, please provide more details.

1
source | link

If this person is perceived as having higher status than you (as in, people tend to listen to them and value this individual's opinion higher than yours) then the situation gets trickier.

You need to make sure there are people with higher hierarchical status who value what you bring to your community, if they appreciate the time and effort you put they can voice your concerns to them and even ask them to speak on your behalf to mitigate this negative person's influence.

An intelligent person will understand the positive vibes you bring to your congregation are more valuable than this other person's negativity, if it boils down to choosing between you or that other person, they will definitely chose you, and the other person will find themselves in the situation where they need to adjust their behavior or leave, that's their choice to make.