Timeline for How can I distinguish between a person being humorous and non-humorous?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
23 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2017 at 3:40 | comment | added | Vylix | Are these jokes related to racism, sexism, or something potentially offensive to anyone? Vegetarianism? Or is this just about unfunny jokes where you have problem on how to respond? | |
| Jul 21, 2017 at 3:38 | comment | added | Vylix | I'm not too sure why providing an example can get you fired - any example I can think about seems harmless, but if you can please provide a similar situation example. As for the current form, I still don't see this as too broad - already limited to acquaintances at work, however an example will be helpful to further refine the answers to your situation. | |
| Jul 21, 2017 at 3:02 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jul 21, 2017 at 4:06 | |||||
| Jul 14, 2017 at 11:40 | comment | added | user117 | @hde well I have a answer that helped and I really can't. The more I give the more likely the company I work for finds out. Idk how bad I can be but it can get me fired | |
| Jul 14, 2017 at 11:39 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Jul 14, 2017 at 2:59 | history | edited | HDE 226868 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Edited title and grammar.
|
| Jul 14, 2017 at 2:57 | comment | added | HDE 226868 | I'm tempted to vote to close as too broad; I think you really should explain the situation in more detail. It certainly can't hurt. | |
| Jul 14, 2017 at 1:48 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jul 14, 2017 at 8:44 | |||||
| Jun 28, 2017 at 2:21 | comment | added | HDE 226868 | Related question: interpersonal.stackexchange.com/q/16/102. | |
| Jun 28, 2017 at 0:08 | answer | added | Ben I. | timeline score: 18 | |
| Jun 27, 2017 at 23:57 | comment | added | user57 | @Christopher I totally get it that's why I suggested fudging it - say it's a neighbour | |
| S Jun 27, 2017 at 23:55 | history | suggested | user57 |
added new and useful tag
|
|
| Jun 27, 2017 at 23:55 | comment | added | user117 | It is best to go light on details as they scan the internet for mentions of them and people have gotten fired over issues and comments on the internet. I would rather not risk anything yet | |
| Jun 27, 2017 at 23:55 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 27, 2017 at 23:55 | |||||
| Jun 27, 2017 at 23:54 | history | edited | user117 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 99 characters in body
|
| Jun 27, 2017 at 23:53 | comment | added | user117 | @Catija it was partially a type and a realization how dumb i was | |
| Jun 27, 2017 at 23:53 | comment | added | user57 | A context would be useful. It's very different how we would relate to a neighbour to a family member to an acquaintance | |
| Jun 27, 2017 at 23:53 | comment | added | Catija | You discovered this in three minutes? | |
| Jun 27, 2017 at 23:52 | comment | added | user117 | @Catija it ends up less delicate then I thought | |
| Jun 27, 2017 at 23:52 | history | edited | user117 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 21 characters in body
|
| Jun 27, 2017 at 23:50 | comment | added | Catija | What makes it delicate? Can you please flesh-out your question a bit more? | |
| Jun 27, 2017 at 23:49 | review | First posts | |||
| Jun 28, 2017 at 10:08 | |||||
| Jun 27, 2017 at 23:49 | history | asked | user117 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |