No matter what I say or do, I am truly just always asking questions about what I do not understand to people who are capable of helping me understand what I need to know about that topic, and no one seems to be willing to answer me, and normally treat me like I'm an idiot... I am autistic with Asperger syndrome, but I’m not stupid by any means. What could I do to finally get people to help me understand what I need to understand, in a lot of different areas and situations?
Everyone has a different expectation of what constitutes a satisfactory answer to any given question he asks, even that question is as straightforward and simple as what 1 + 1 equals. That is due to the fact that there are certain subjective presumptions of prior knowledge inherent in both the question and in any attempted answer that are by no means obvious other than to the questioner and the answerer themselves. To bridge such gap between the two, the questioner should try to state such “prior knowledge” as far as possible, such as by stating:
- your educational attainment and relevant experience,
- your previous attempts as in what you have done in solving the question yourself,
- your difficulties with following the logic from progressing from one step to the next among the bits of information that you have gathered, or
- at the very least, describe how the question came across your mind in the first place, which gives context to the question that most people might have been in a similar situation some time in their lives and would then spot what you have missed in your search for the answer. (This is why many support desks for software bugs asks you to “reproduce” the issue that you faced.)
Another piece of advice is: do not treat an unsatisfactory answer as not an answer at all, but bits of breadcrumb for you to trace the eventual satisfactory answer. The fact that you felt others treat you as an idiot, is probably because others got no information from you about your “prior knowledge” and therefore would make no such presumption on you and start their explanation from a clean slate. That does not mean they are not trying to guide you to approach the question from the right perspective.
For instance, for
1 + 1 = ?,
someone might start with introducing the Arabic numeral system and counting (1, 2, 3, ...). This is perfectly valid for societies that operate more on a non-Arabic numeral systems.
Someone might start with introducing the arithmetic operators “+” to mean joining and extending the counting from the left-hand-side operand to the right-hand-side operand. This is when one wishes the questioner to understand the method, rather than only the direct answer to the specific question asked, with an aim to also helping solve similar addition questions e.g. 1 + 2, 2 + 2, etc.
Someone might brush the question off by saying “For goodness sake get a calculator”. This may be rude, but in fact the most direct answer that would enable anyone with any level of prior knowledge to get the answer because what it takes is just to recognise these three buttons “1”, “+”, “=“ and enter them sequentially as how the question reads, and would open the door to a plethora of solutions that a calculator could give to millions of arithmetic problems.
The mindset that requires you in order to bridge the “prior knowledge” gap as soon as possible is to be humble and giving the “benefit of doubt” to those who do spend the time and effort to give you an answer (albeit appearing unsatisfactory or condescending to you), and try to seriously consider how different those answers are from the previous attempts that you have tried in solving the question yourself. If you really cannot glean anything from the answers given, try to stand in the answerer’s shoes and tell people what you would do were you the answerer, such that that could more effectively enable the questioner to arrive at the answer (e.g. Questioner: I would hope someone could kindly point to a reference in an academic journal, or point to a wiki entry, or suggest some Google search keywords, to enlighten me on the answer to the question.). In fact, for most of the cases online, if the answers are solely just to mock you and not trying to get you anywhere, they probably would not have survived the downvotes from moderators and peers before you read them and realised they contain no merits.
This is the most I can suggest you without any examples given like what the comments above suggested. Cheers.