I was recently laid off in a second round of layoffs while my old company was going through some restructuring. Yet, I would consider myself to be on good terms with my old company as:
- I got a decent severance package
- I am still working with them to pay for my latest Masters Degree class that they requested I take while I was still under their employ
- They invited me to the xmas party 2 days after the lay off where despite my change of employment status I still was asked to give a toast and shook hands with the partners and president of the firm.
With this foundation of the story being what it is I am firmly in the interview process w/ ~18 diff companies interested in reaching out to me to do interviews, it would be fair to say that I have gone through a decent number of interviews sofar. Further in my previous employment had the opportunity to sit on the other side of the table and give ~100x interviews (eg. this isnt my first rodeo).
However in my most recent interview, the person doing the interview pulled up the recruitment page of my previous company where he found that they where recruiting for the position I was laid off from (most likely a situation in which they never took down the recruitment post because they are always looking for exceptional people type thing). This interviewer then accused me of being fired with cause.
Now, I am not easily flustered but at the time I couldn't think of a response to this as it is something very hard to prove even though I knew his accusation to be false. Am I wrong to think that this was taboo to bring up in this interview? What might have been a good way to respond to this accusation that wouldn't come across as either weak or argumentative?